Saturday March 18th - False Alarm and Missed ID
Saturday
March 18th – False Alarm and Missed ID
On Friday someone had reported a Pacific
Loon complete with several faraway photos at the Findlay Reservoir about an
hour south of us. Although the photos
were fuzzy, we noticed a light gray nape on the Loon’s neck. This is usually a diagnostic feature of a
Pacific Loon. This bird would have been
an Ohio lifer, so Saturday morning we went to chase it.
The conditions were miserable. It was cold, very blustery and when we
arrived a light drizzle was falling.
Findlay Reservoir is actually two twin very large reservoirs. We walked along the elevated dikes, and the
wind was howling. I felt like I was
going to get frostbite on my face. We
spotted some ducks and several Common Loons but nothing that looked like a
Pacific Loon. The wind was buffeting our
scope, so it was hard to focus on anything.
At one point Mike said, “I’m tearing up, can you look at these birds?”
We were frozen and heading back to the
car when we saw one more loon in the distance.
We both looked through the scope and said, “That’s him!” It looked exactly like the photos we had seen
earlier with the light gray nape and dark face.
However, later that day one of the top Ohio birders who had also seen
the loon posted that he thought it was a Common Loon in strange transitional
plumage (changing from non-breeding to breeding). Now we were questioning our sighting.
Two days later several other birders
again reported a Pacific Loon with no additional photos. This sparked a discussion among the experts
and the consensus was that based on the shape of the bird particularly the “block
head” that the bird was indeed a Common Loon.
A Pacific Loon is smaller and has a very smooth rounded head. We quickly removed that sighting from our
list. The misidentification of a bird,
particularly a potentially rare bird doesn’t look good.
Any chance it was a hybrid? How do birder's handle hybrids with their lists?
ReplyDelete